NASA Doubles Down, Advances Six Innovative Tech Concepts to New Phase

NASA Doubles Down, Advances Six Innovative Tech Concepts to New Phase

3 min read

Preparations for Next Moonwalk Simulations Underway (and Underwater)

Collage of artist concepts of 2024 NIAC Phase II
A collage of artist concepts highlighting the novel approaches proposed by the 2024 NIAC Phase II awardees for possible future missions.
Credits: NASA, From left: Edward Balaban, Mary Knapp, Mahmooda Sultana, Brianna Clements, Ethan Schaler

NASA’s Innovative Advanced Concepts program (NIAC) has selected six visionary concept studies for additional funding and development. Each study has already completed the initial NIAC phase, showing their futuristic ideas – like a lunar railway system and fluid-based telescopes – may provide fresh perspectives and approaches as NASA explores the unknown in space.

The NIAC Phase II conceptual studies will receive up to $600,000 to continue working over the next two years to address key remaining technical and budget hurdles and pave their development path forward. When Phase II is complete, these studies could advance to the final NIAC phase, earning additional funding and development consideration toward becoming a future aerospace mission.

“These diverse, science fiction-like concepts represent a fantastic class of Phase II studies,” said John Nelson, NIAC program executive at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “Our NIAC fellows never cease to amaze and inspire, and this class definitely gives NASA a lot to think about in terms of what’s possible in the future.”  The six concepts chosen for 2024 NIAC Phase II awards are:

Fluidic Telescope (FLUTE): Enabling the Next Generation of Large Space Observatories would create a large optical observatory in space using fluidic shaping of ionic liquids. These in-space observatories could potentially help investigate NASA’s highest priority astrophysics targets, including Earth-like exoplanets, first-generation stars, and young galaxies. The FLUTE study is led by Edward Balaban from NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley.

Pulsed Plasma Rocket: Shielded, Fast Transits for Humans to Mars is an innovative propulsion system that relies on using fission-generated packets of plasma for thrust. This innovative system could significantly reduce travel times between Earth and any destination in the solar system.  This study is led by Brianna Clements with Howe Industries in Scottsdale, Arizona.

The Great Observatory for Long Wavelengths (GO-LoW) could change the way NASA conducts astronomy. This mega constellation low-frequency radio telescope uses thousands of autonomous SmallSats capable of measuring the magnetic fields emitted from exoplanets and the cosmic dark ages. GO-LoW is led by Mary Knapp with MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Radioisotope Thermoradiative Cell Power Generator is investigating new in-space power sources, potentially operating at higher efficiencies than NASA legacy power generators. This technology could enable small exploration and science spacecraft in the future that are unable to carry bulky solar or nuclear power systems. This power generation concept study is from Stephen Polly at the Rochester Institute of Technology in New York.

FLOAT: Flexible Levitation on a Track would be a lunar railway system, providing reliable, autonomous, and efficient payload transport on the Moon. This rail system could support daily operations of a sustainable lunar base as soon as the 2030s. Ethan Schaler leads FLOAT at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California.

ScienceCraft for Outer Planet Exploration distributes Quantum Dot-based sensors throughout the surface of a solar sail, enabling it to become an innovative imager. Quantum physics would allow NASA to take scientific measurements through studying how the dots absorb light. By leveraging the solar sail’s area, it allows lighter, more cost-effective spacecraft to carry imagers across the solar system. ScienceCraft is led by NASA’s Mahmooda Sultana at the agency’s Goddard Spaceflight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate funds the NIAC program, as it is responsible for developing the agency’s new cross-cutting technologies and capabilities to achieve its current and future missions.

To learn more about NIAC and the 2024 Phase II studies, visit:

https://www.nasa.gov/stmd-the-nasa-innovative-advanced-concepts-niac/

Powered by WPeMatico

Get The Details…
Loura Hall

NASA Selects Students for Europa Clipper Intern Program

NASA Selects Students for Europa Clipper Intern Program

4 min read

NASA Selects Students for Europa Clipper Intern Program

NASA has selected 40 undergraduate students for the first year of its Europa ICONS (Inspiring Clipper: Opportunities for Next-generation Scientists) internship program, supporting the agency’s Europa Clipper mission. Europa ICONS matches students with mentors from the mission’s science team for a 10-week program to conduct original scientific research on topics related to the mission to Jupiter’s moon Europa. 

Artist’s rendering of NASA’s Europa Clipper spacecraft.
Artist’s rendering of NASA’s Europa Clipper spacecraft.
NASA/JPL-Caltech

The program is planned to run every year until Europa Clipper completes its prime mission in 2034 and is open to applications from all U.S. undergraduate STEM majors, with preference given to students from non-high research activity universities and underserved institutions.

ICONS internships may be in-person at the mentor’s institution, virtual, or hybrid, depending on the research project and needs of the mentor and intern. As part of the program, students and mentors will convene for a two-day meeting at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Southern California. The first Europa ICONS internship will run Monday, June 3 through Friday, Aug. 9.

The students selected for the Europa ICONS program in 2024 are:

Sarah Ruetschle, John Carroll University in University Heights, Ohio

Cole Anderson, University of California, Santa Cruz

Hamza Ouriour, Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston

Ethan Piacenti, Olivet Nazarene University in Bourbonnais, Illinois

Jared Bouck, Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff, Arizona

Kayla Blair, Northern Arizona University

Carly Davis, McNeese State University in Lake Charles, Louisiana

Matthew Perkins, Red Rocks Community College in Lakewood, Colorado

Angela Zhang, Cornell University in Ithaca, New York

Arianna Rodriguez Ortiz, University of Puerto Rico–Mayaguez

Beverly Malugin Ayala, University of Puerto Rico–Mayaguez

Jeansel Johnson-Ayala, University of Puerto Rico–Rio Piedras 

Akemi Takeuchi, University of Maryland, College Park

Sofia Merchant-Dest, University of Maryland–University College in Adelphi

Gradon Robbins, University of Florida in Gainesville

Jason Sioeng, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tyler Yuen, San Jose State University in San Jose, California

Dallin Nelson, Southern Utah University in Cedar City

Eric Stinemetz, University of Houston–Downtown

Lucas Nerbonne, Middlebury College in Middlebury, Vermont

Hope Jerris, Middlebury College

Jacob Dietrich, Indiana University, Southeast in New Albany

Jocelyn Mateo, Lorain County Community College in Elyria, Ohio

Samuel Brown, San Diego Mesa College in San Diego

Madison Stanford, Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles

Bryce McGimsey, Solano Community College in Fairfield, California

Noah Alayon, CUNY LaGuardia Community College in Queens, New York

Trevor Erwin, University of Texas at Austin

Ava Frost, Mount Holyoke College in South Hadley, Massachusetts

Brianna Casey, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York

Fatima Mendoza, Texas Tech University in Lubbock

Daniel Voyles, Harvey Mudd College in Claremont, California

Swaroop Sathyanarayanan, Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta

Jay Patel, Louisiana State University College of Engineering in Baton Rouge

Juliane Keiper, Amherst College in Amherst, Massachusetts

Emory Long, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University in Tallahassee

Scott Chang, University of Wisconsin–Madison

Hayden Ferrell, Arizona State University in Tempe

Isabella Musto, Denison University in Granville, Ohio

Elizabeth Kirby, College of Charleston in Charleston, South Carolina

The Europa Clipper mission’s three main science objectives are to determine the thickness of the moon’s icy shell and its surface interactions with the ocean below, to investigate its composition, and to characterize its geology. The mission’s detailed exploration of Europa will help scientists better understand the astrobiological potential for habitable worlds beyond our planet.

The Europa ICONS program is managed by the Planetary Science Division within NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington and is part of a larger effort known as Clipper Next Gen, a decade-long strategy using the Europa Clipper mission to train and diversify the next generation of planetary scientists.

Managed by Caltech in Pasadena, California, JPL leads the development of the Europa Clipper mission in partnership with the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland, for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington. APL designed the main spacecraft body in collaboration with JPL and NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. The Planetary Missions Program Office at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, executes program management of the Europa Clipper mission.

For more information on the Europa ICONS program, visit:
https://science.nasa.gov/planetary-science/europa-clipper-icons-internships/

Karen Fox / Charles Blue
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1257 / 202-802-5345
karen.c.fox@nasa.gov / charles.e.blue@nasa.gov

Powered by WPeMatico

Get The Details…

NASA Mission Strengthens 40-Year Friendship 

NASA Mission Strengthens 40-Year Friendship 

From left, NASA astronaut Barry “Butch” Wilmore and family pose for a photo with Billy Stover and family.
Photo credit: Billy Stover

As NASA astronaut Butch Wilmore launches aboard Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft to the International Space Station Monday, May 6 on its first crewed flight, one of his best friends will have played a key role in getting him there. 

Billy Stover, chief safety officer for NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, and Wilmore have been friends for more than 40 years. The pair’s friendship began in the 1980s at Tennessee Tech University on the football field. 

“We would do weight training and we would get paired up,” said Stover. “If he did 50 sit-ups, I had to do 55. Or we would see how many sit-ups we could get done in 30 seconds or vice versa – we were not kind to each other.” 

As a representative in the Office of Safety and Mission Assurance’s technical authority, Stover oversees coordination and integration within NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, enacting quality processes and conducting risk analysis to ensure the safety of crews to and from low Earth orbit. 

Wilmore and NASA astronaut Suni Williams will fly Starliner, lifting off aboard United Launch Alliance’s Atlas V rocket from Space Launch Complex-41 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, for about a one week stay aboard the space station, in support of NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test. 

Stover says he gets goosebumps thinking about the years of work and excitement that have gone into the upcoming crew flight test launch. 

“I will tell you that I’m a little bit calmer than I have been for probably the past two years,” Stover said. “The team has been amazing in working through each challenge and test anomalies to get us to the right place to execute the launch. What we do every single day makes history.” 

Both men briefly lost touch after college when their careers took them in different directions, as Wilmore became a Navy pilot and Stover pursued engineering. In 2002, Stover ran into Wilmore walking out of the Launch Control Center during a space shuttle launch campaign at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida and reconnected. 

Since then, Stover and Wilmore find the opportunity to speak weekly or as often as they can – even if one of them happens to be off planet. In 2014, Wilmore made time to call Stover at Christmas while aboard the space station for Expedition 41. 

“On my answering machine was a message from Barry calling me from the space station to wish me and my family a ‘Merry Christmas.’” Stover said. “I saved that message for three years. How many people get a call from space?” 

When Wilmore received the 2018 Theodore Roosevelt award at the NCAA Awards Presentation, the association’s highest honor exemplifying the ideals of college sports, Stover attended. Former astronaut and U.S. Sen. John Glenn, astronaut Sally Ride, and flight director Christopher C. Kraft Jr. also received the award. 

“He interjected me in his acceptance speech, which was really special,” Stover said. “We’re like brothers.” 

Billy Stover and Butch Wilmore pose during Second from left, Billy Stover poses next to Butch Wilmore, middle, during Theodore Roosevelt award ceremony in January 2018
Second from left, Billy Stover and attendees pose next to Barry “Butch” Wilmore, middle, during Theodore Roosevelt award ceremony in January 2018.
Photo credit: Billy Stover

Their 40-year friendship expanded beyond football and space. Now with a son in the Navy, Stover says that Wilmore is more than a friend; he’s also a mentor. 

“We both have a wife and kids, similar backgrounds, and values on how we manage ourselves,” Stover said. “Barry’s turned into a great mentor for my oldest son, who’s an officer in the Navy.” Wilmore is a retired U.S. Navy captain. 

Astronaut Barry "Butch" Wilmore and family pose with Billy Stover and family during a visit to a Florida theme park.
From left, NASA astronaut Barry “Butch” Wilmore and family pose with Billy Stover and family during a visit to a Florida theme park.
Photo credit: Billy Stover

Both men have a love for theme parks and frequently plan trips to them. In fact, Stover’s own travel plans will take him away from Florida and he won’t see NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test launch. Instead, he’ll be on a transatlantic cruise that was booked more than a year ago. 

“It’s a weird feeling that I’m not going to be here physically,” Stover said. “Godspeed to him and Suni. I’m always here for them.” 

Stover and Wilmore no longer use that competitive spirit against each other but still work out from time to time. 

“In his position, he’s a lot more disciplined and in better condition than me, but now he’s nice about it,” Stover said.  

NASA’s Commercial Crew Program is working with the American aerospace industry to launch astronauts on American rockets and spacecraft from American soil to the International Space Station. This innovative approach is helping the agency maintain a human presence in low Earth orbit and enable exploration to the Moon in preparation for Mars for the benefit of humanity. 

Powered by WPeMatico

Get The Details…
Elyna N. Niles-Carnes

Orbits and Kepler’s Laws

Orbits and Kepler’s Laws

9 Min Read

Orbits and Kepler’s Laws

Orange sun with colorful planets trailing out to one side.
An illustration of our solar system.
Credits:
NASA/JPL

Kepler’s Laws of Planetary Motion

The story of how we understand planetary motion could not be told if it were not for the work of a German mathematician named Johannes Kepler. 

Kepler’s three laws describe how planets orbit the Sun. They describe how (1) planets move in elliptical orbits with the Sun as a focus, (2) a planet covers the same area of space in the same amount of time no matter where it is in its orbit, and (3) a planet’s orbital period is proportional to the size of its orbit.

The planets orbit the Sun in a counterclockwise direction as viewed from above the Sun’s north pole, and the planets’ orbits all are aligned to what astronomers call the ecliptic plane.

Who Was Johannes Kepler?

Johannes Kepler was born on Dec. 27, 1571, in Weil der Stadt, Württemberg, which is now in the German state of Baden-Württemberg.

A black and white drawing of Johannes Kepler showing him with dark hair, a mustache and beard, and wearing a high collar shirt with lace around the edges.
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) was a German astronomer best known for determining three principles of how planets orbit the Sun, known as Kepler’s laws of planetary motion.
Courtesy of the Archives, California Institute of Technology

As a rather frail young man, the exceptionally talented Kepler turned to mathematics and the study of the heavens early on. When he was six, his mother pointed out a comet visible in the night sky. When Kepler was nine, his father took him out one night under the stars to observe a lunar eclipse. These events both made a vivid impression on Kepler’s youthful mind and turned him toward a life dedicated to astronomy.

Kepler lived and worked in Graz, Austria, during the tumultuous early 17th century. Due to religious and political difficulties common during that era, Kepler was banished from Graz on Aug. 2, 1600. 

Fortunately, he found work as an assistant to the famous Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe (usually referred to by his first name) in Prague. Kepler moved his family from Graz, 300 miles (480 kilometers) across the Danube River to Tycho’s home.

Mars is a reddish brown in this image from a spacecraft. A deep gash is visible across the center of the planet.
The global mosaic of Mars was created using Viking 1 Orbiter images taken in February 1980. The mosaic shows the entire Valles Marineris canyon system stretching across the center of Mars. It’s more than 2,000 miles (3,000 kilometers) long, 370 miles (600 kilometers) wide and 5 miles (8 kilometers) deep.
NASA

Kepler and the Mars Problem

Tycho was a brilliant astronomer. He is credited with making the most accurate astronomical observations of his time, which he accomplished without the aid of a telescope. He had been impressed with Kepler’s studies in an earlier meeting. 

However, some historians think Tycho mistrusted Kepler, fearing that his bright young intern might eclipse him as the premier astronomer of his day. Because of this, he only let Kepler see part of his voluminous collection of planetary data.

Tycho assigned Kepler the task of understanding the orbit of the planet Mars. The movement of Mars was problematic – it didn’t quite fit the models as described by Greek philosopher and scientist Aristotle (384 to 322 B.C.E.) and Egyptian astronomer Claudius Ptolemy (about 100 C.E to 170 C.E.). Aristotle thought Earth was the center of the universe, and that the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars revolved around it. Ptolemy developed this concept into a standardized,  geocentric model (now known as the Ptolemaic system) based around Earth as a stationary object, at the center of the universe.

Historians think that part of Tycho’s motivation for giving the Mars problem to Kepler was Tycho’s hope that it would keep Kepler occupied while Tycho worked to perfect his own theory of the solar system. That theory was based on a geocentric model, modified from Ptolemy’s, in which the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn all orbit the Sun, which in turn orbits Earth. 

As it turned out, Kepler, unlike Tycho, believed firmly in a model of the solar system known as the heliocentric model, which correctly placed the Sun at its center. This is also known as the Copernican system, because it was developed by astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543). But the reason Mars’ orbit was problematic was because the Copernican system incorrectly assumed the orbits of the planets to be circular.

Like many philosophers of his era, Kepler had a mystical belief that the circle was the universe’s perfect shape, so he also thought the planets’ orbits must be circular. For many years, he struggled to make Tycho’s observations of the motions of Mars match up with a circular orbit.

Kepler eventually realized that the orbits of the planets are not perfect circles. His brilliant insight was that planets move in elongated, or flattened, circles called ellipses. 

The particular difficulties Tycho had with the movement of Mars were due to the fact that its orbit was the most elliptical of the planets for which he had extensive data. Thus, in a twist of irony, Tycho unwittingly gave Kepler the very part of his data that would enable his assistant to formulate the correct theory of the solar system.

Basic Properties of Ellipses

Since the orbits of the planets are ellipses, it might be helpful to review three basic properties of an ellipse:

  1. An ellipse is defined by two points, each called a focus, and together called foci. The sum of the distances to the foci from any point on the ellipse is always a constant. 
  2. The amount of flattening of the ellipse is called the eccentricity. The flatter the ellipse, the more eccentric it is. Each ellipse has an eccentricity with a value between zero (a circle), and one (essentially a flat line, technically called a parabola).
  3. The longest axis of the ellipse is called the major axis, while the shortest axis is called the minor axis. Half of the major axis is termed a semi-major axis. 

After determining that the orbits of the planets are elliptical, Kepler formulated three laws of planetary motion, which accurately described the motion of comets as well.

Kepler’s Laws

In 1609 Kepler published “Astronomia Nova,” which explained what are now called Kepler’s first two laws of planetary motion. Kepler had noticed that an imaginary line drawn from a planet to the Sun swept out an equal area of space in equal times, regardless of where the planet was in its orbit. If you draw a triangle from the Sun to a planet’s position at one point in time and its position at a fixed time later, the area of that triangle is always the same, anywhere in the orbit. 

For all these triangles to have the same area, the planet must move more quickly when it’s near the Sun, but more slowly when it is farther from the Sun. This discovery became Kepler’s second law of orbital motion, and led to the realization of what became Kepler’s first law: that the planets move in an ellipse with the Sun at one focus point, offset from the center. 

In 1619, Kepler published “Harmonices Mundi,” in which he describes his “third law.” The third law shows that there is a precise mathematical relationship between a planet’s distance from the Sun and the amount of time it takes revolve around the Sun.

Here are Kepler’s Three Laws:

Kepler’s First Law: Each planet’s orbit about the Sun is an ellipse. The Sun’s center is always located at one focus of the ellipse. The planet follows the ellipse in its orbit, meaning that the planet-to-Sun distance is constantly changing as the planet goes around its orbit.

Kepler’s Second Law: The imaginary line joining a planet and the Sun sweeps out – or covers – equal areas of space during equal time intervals as the planet orbits. Basically, the planets do not move with constant speed along their orbits. Instead, their speed varies so that the line joining the centers of the Sun and the planet covers an equal area in equal amounts of time. The point of nearest approach of the planet to the Sun is called perihelion. The point of greatest separation is aphelion, hence by Kepler’s second law, a planet is moving fastest when it is at perihelion and slowest at aphelion.

Kepler’s Third Law: The orbital period of a planet, squared, is directly proportional to the semi-major axes of its orbit, cubed. This is written in equation form as p2=a3. Kepler’s third law implies that the period for a planet to orbit the Sun increases rapidly with the radius of its orbit. Mercury, the innermost planet, takes only 88 days to orbit the Sun. Earth takes 365 days, while distant Saturn requires 10,759 days to do the same.  

How We Use Kepler’s Laws Today

Kepler didn’t know about gravity, which is responsible for holding the planets in their orbits around the Sun, when he came up with his three laws. But Kepler’s laws were instrumental in Isaac Newton’s development of his theory of universal gravitation, which explained the unknown force behind Kepler’s third law. Kepler and his theories were crucial in the understanding of solar system dynamics and as a springboard to newer theories that more accurately approximate planetary orbits. However, his third law only applies to objects in our own solar system. 

Newton’s version of Kepler’s third law allows us to calculate the masses of any two objects in space if we know the distance between them and how long they take to orbit each other (their orbital period). What Newton realized was that the orbits of objects in space depend on their masses, which led him to discover gravity.

Newton’s generalized version of Kepler’s third law is the basis of most measurements we can make of the masses of distant objects in space today. These applications include determining the masses of moons orbiting the planets, stars that orbit each other, the masses of black holes (using nearby stars affected by their gravity), the masses of exoplanets (planets orbiting stars other than our Sun), and the existence of mysterious dark matter in our galaxy and others.

In planning trajectories (or flight plans) for spacecraft, and in making measurements of the masses of the moons and planets, modern scientists often go a step beyond Newton. They account for factors related to Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which is necessary to achieve the precision required by modern science measurements and spaceflight. 

However, Newton’s laws are still accurate enough for many applications, and Kepler’s laws remain an excellent guide for understanding how the planets move in our solar system.

Illustration of NASA's Kepler space telescope
NASA’s Kepler space telescope discovered thousands of planets outside our solar system, and revealed that our galaxy contains more planets than stars.
NASA

Johannes Kepler died Nov. 15, 1630, at age 58. NASA’s Kepler space telescope was named for him. The spacecraft launched March 6, 2009, and spent nine years searching for Earth-like planets orbiting other stars in our region of the Milky Way. The Kepler space telescope left a legacy of more than 2,600 planet discoveries from outside our solar system, many of which could be promising places for life.

Powered by WPeMatico

Get The Details…

35 Years Ago: STS-30 Launches Magellan to Venus

35 Years Ago: STS-30 Launches Magellan to Venus

On May 4, 1989, space shuttle Atlantis took off on its third flight, STS-30, from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida. Its five-person crew of Commander David M. Walker, Pilot Ronald J. Grabe, and Mission Specialists Mark C. Lee, Norman E. Thagard, and Mary L. Cleave flew a four-day mission that deployed the Magellan spacecraft, managed by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, to study Venus, uniting NASA’s human and interplanetary spaceflight programs. It also marked the first U.S. planetary launch since 1978. The astronauts deployed Magellan and its upper stage on their first day in space, sending the spacecraft on its 15-month journey to Venus. Following its arrival at the cloud-shrouded planet, Magellan spent four years mapping Venus in unprecedented detail, vastly increasing our knowledge of the planet.

The STS-30 crew of Pilot Ronald J. Grabe, left, Commander David M. Walker, and Mission Specialists Norman E. Thagard, Mary L. Cleave, and Mark C. Lee The STS-30 crew patch The Magellan spacecraft in Atlantis’ payload bay in preparation for STS-30
Left: The STS-30 crew of Pilot Ronald J. Grabe, left, Commander David M. Walker, and Mission Specialists Norman E. Thagard, Mary L. Cleave, and Mark C. Lee. Middle: The STS-30 crew patch. Right: The Magellan spacecraft in Atlantis’ payload bay in preparation for STS-30.

In March 1988, NASA announced Walker, Grabe, Lee, Thagard, and Cleave as the STS-30 crew for the flight planned for late April 1989. Thagard had flown twice before, on STS-7 in June 1983 and the STS-51B Spacelab 3 mission in April-May 1985. Walker, Grabe, and Cleave had each flown once before, on STS-51A, STS-51J, and STS-61B, respectively, while STS-30 marked Lee’s first trip into space. Walker and Thagard joined NASA in the astronaut class of 1978, Grabe and Cleave joined in 1980, and Lee in 1984. During their four-day mission, the astronauts planned to deploy Magellan and its Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) on the first flight day. Magellan needed to launch within a 29-day window, dictated by the alignments of Venus and Earth to achieve the proper trajectory for the journey to its destination.

In March 1988, NASA announced Walker, Grabe, Lee, Thagard, and Cleave as the STS-30 crew for the flight planned for late April 1989. Thagard had flown twice before, on STS-7 in June 1983 and the STS-51B Spacelab 3 mission in April-May 1985. Walker, Grabe, and Cleave had each flown once before, on STS-51A, STS-51J, and STS-61B, respectively, while STS-30 marked Lee’s first trip into space. Walker and Thagard joined NASA in the astronaut class of 1978, Grabe and Cleave joined in 1980, and Lee in 1984. During their four-day mission, the astronauts planned to deploy Magellan and its Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) on the first flight day. Magellan needed to launch within a 29-day window, dictated by the alignments of Venus and Earth to achieve the proper trajectory for the journey to its destination. Global map of Venus based on Pioneer Venus Orbiter radar data Schematic of Magellan’s trajectory from Earth to Venus
Left: Global map of Venus based on Pioneer Venus Orbiter radar data. Middle: Engineers at Martin Marietta prepare Magellan for shipment to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Right: Schematic of Magellan’s trajectory from Earth to Venus.

Magellan sought to acquire the highest resolution radar imagery of Venus, improving on data obtained by earlier spacecraft. During its 14 years orbiting Venus between 1978 and 1992, Pioneer Venus Orbiter, managed by the NASA Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley, among other observations used its radar to map approximately 90% of Venus at a resolution of about 10 kilometers. Scientists yearned for higher resolution radar imagery, and the Soviet Union’s Venera 15 and 16, with their larger antennas, mapped about a quarter of the planet’s surface to a resolution of 1 to 2 kilometers between October 1983 and June 1984. Initiated as the Venus Radar Mapper mission in 1983, NASA renamed the project in 1985 after the 16th century Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan. Martin Marietta Astronautics Group in Denver built the spacecraft, much of it from space parts, including using a spare main spacecraft bus from the Voyager program. Originally, plans called for Magellan to launch in April 1988 aboard the space shuttle using a Centaur upper stage to send it on a four-month journey to Venus. Following the Challenger accident, NASA canceled the Centaur as a space shuttle upper stage, remanifesting Magellan on the IUS. The first available launch window for a four-month flight occurred in October 1989, but the Jupiter-bound Galileo spacecraft needed that opportunity as it required a gravity-assist at Venus to get it to its final destination. Specialists settled on a longer flight time for Magellan to use the earlier April-May 1989 window. After deployment from the shuttle, the two-stage IUS would place Magellan on its interplanetary journey that would take it 1.5 times around the Sun. Arriving at Venus, Magellan’s solid-rocket Star 48B motor would fire to place it into orbit around Venus to begin its primary mission lasting 243 days, the duration of one Venusian day. Using its high-gain antenna as a radar dish, Magellan would map at least 70 percent of the cloud-shrouded planet’s surface to a resolution of one kilometer.

STS-27 astronauts inspect the tile damage on Atlantis Closeup of missing tile area on Atlantis Atlantis returns to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida following STS-27
Left: STS-27 astronauts inspect the tile damage on Atlantis. Middle: Closeup of missing tile area on Atlantis. Right: Atlantis returns to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida following STS-27.

Atlantis landed at Edwards Air Force Base in California’s Mojave Desert on Dec. 6, 1988, concluding the STS-27 mission. During launch four days earlier, 85 seconds after liftoff a piece of insulation from the tip of the right-hand solid rocket booster broke away and struck Atlantis’ right side. While in orbit, the crew used the shuttle’s Remote Manipulator System, or robotic arm, to image Atlantis for any signs of damage. The astronauts clearly saw extensive damage on their onboard monitors, but due to the classified nature of the mission, downlinking the video required encryption that greatly degraded the image quality. Ground controllers did not fully appreciate the extent of the damage and remained unconcerned during Atlantis’ reentry. Not until the postlanding inspection did engineers and managers realize with alarm how close they came to disaster. Atlantis arrived back at KSC on Dec. 13, where workers towed it to the Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF) the next day for investigation into and repair of the most significant tile damage seen up to that time. More than 700 tiles received some damage, with one tile missing entirely and the underlying metal partially melted.

Space shuttle Atlantis arrives at Launch Pad 39B STS-30 astronauts pose with a model of Magellan following their March 27 preflight press conference Atlantis rises into the sky
Left: Space shuttle Atlantis arrives at Launch Pad 39B. Middle: STS-30 astronauts pose with a model of Magellan following their March 27 preflight press conference. Right: Atlantis rises into the sky.

Magellan arrived at KSC on Oct. 8, 1988, for preflight processing in a clean room at the Spacecraft Assembly and Encapsulation Facility (SAFE). On Feb. 15, 1989, workers moved Magellan from the SAFE to the Vertical Processing Facility for mating with the IUS and reinstallation of its high-gain antenna. On March 17, they transported Magellan out to Launch Pad 39B, where it awaited Atlantis’ arrival.

On March 11, workers rolled Atlantis from the OPF to the Vehicle Assembly Building for mating with its External Tank and twin Solid Rocket Boosters. Atlantis rolled out to Launch Pad 39B on March 22, just nine days after Discovery lifted off from the same pad on the STS-29 mission, the shortest such turnaround time. Workers installed Magellan into Atlantis’ payload bay on March 25. The Terminal Countdown Demonstration Test took place on April 6-7, with the astronauts participating in the final few hours as on launch day. Senior NASA managers held the Flight Readiness Review on April 13-14 and declared Atlantis and Magellan ready for launch on April 28. The five-member astronaut crew arrived at KSC on April 25 for final preparations for the launch.

An international delegation including Soviet scientists and Soviet cosmonaut Igor D. Volk, training to fly the Soviet shuttle Buran, arrived at KSC to witness the planned launch. The countdown continued smoothly for the mid-afternoon liftoff until one of the range safety computers went offline. Faced with a short 23-minute launch window, range safety officers got the computer back online, having delayed the planned liftoff by only five minutes. Then at T-31 seconds, the ground launch sequencer called a halt to the countdown due to the failure of a recirculating pump in main engine number 1, scrubbing the launch for the day. The crew exited Atlantis 46 minutes later and returned to crew quarters to try another day. That day came on May 4, after technicians replaced the faulty pump and a hydrogen line. The launch window had grown to a more comfortable one hour and four minutes, with the fickle Florida weather using up much of that time.

Magellan in Atlantis’ payload bay, its large high-gain antenna prominently visible Magellan and its Inertial Upper Stage moments after deployment from Atlantis With its solar arrays now deployed, Magellan departs from the shuttle Atlantis’ empty payload bay after Magellan’s departure
Left: Magellan in Atlantis’ payload bay, its large high-gain antenna prominently visible. Middle left: Magellan and its Inertial Upper Stage moments after deployment from Atlantis. Middle right: With its solar arrays now deployed, Magellan departs from the shuttle. Right: Atlantis’ empty payload bay after Magellan’s departure.

With clouds and winds threatening to scrub the launch, Atlantis found a few minutes of acceptable weather near the end of the launch window and lifted off at 2:47 p.m. EDT, sending America’s first planetary spacecraft in 11 years on a mission to map Venus’ cloud-shrouded surface. As soon as the shuttle cleared the launch tower, control shifted to the Mission Control Center at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, where Ascent Flight Director A. Lee Briscoe and his team of operators, including astronaut Frank L. Culbertson serving as the capsule communicator, or capcom, monitored all aspects of the launch. Following main engine cutoff, Atlantis and its crew had reached space but not yet achieved orbit. Two minutes later, a 2-minute 39-second firing of the Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS) engines placed them in a 184-by-75-mile orbit. Forty minutes later, a second 2-minute OMS burn circularized the orbit at 184 miles. The astronauts removed their bulky Launch and Entry Suits (LES) and prepared Atlantis for orbital operations, including opening the payload bay doors. Preparations for Magellan’s deployment began shortly thereafter. In Mission Control, Flight Director J. Milton Heflin and his team, including capcom Pierre J. Thuot, took over to assist the crew with deployment operations. The astronauts activated Magellan and the IUS and ground teams began checking out their systems, with the first TV from the mission showing the spacecraft and its upper stage in the payload bay. Walker and Grabe oriented Atlantis to the deployment attitude while Lee raised Magellan’s tilt table first to 29 degrees then to the deploy position of 52 degrees. With all systems operating normally, Mission Control gave the go for deploy. Six hours and 14 minutes into the mission, Walker called down, “Magellan is deployed.” The 40,118-pound spacecraft and upper stage combination glided over the shuttle’s crew compartment. Ten minutes later, Magellan deployed its two solar array wings to begin generating power. Walker and Grabe fired the two OMS engines to move Atlantis a safe distance away from the IUS burn that took place one hour after deployment, sending Magellan on its way to Venus. The primary task of the mission accomplished, the astronauts prepared for their first night’s sleep in space.

STS-30 crew Earth observation photograph of the Texas Gulf Coast including Houston STS-30 crew Earth observation photograph of New Orleans STS-30 crew Earth observation photograph of the Cape Canaveral area in Florida including NASA’s Kennedy Space Center
STS-30 crew Earth observation photographs. Left: The Texas Gulf Coast including Houston. Middle: New Orleans. Right: The Cape Canaveral area in Florida including NASA’s Kennedy Space Center.

Mission Control awakened the crew with the theme music from the movie “Superman” to begin their second mission day, their first full day in space. Compared to their very busy first day, the rest of the mission’s timeline seemed relatively more relaxed. Cleave began work on the Fluids Experiment Apparatus (FEA), a modular chemistry and physics laboratory specifically designed for space shuttle missions. On STS-30, Cleave and Lee processed samples of indium and selenium in the FEA to see the effects of microgravity on the crystals produced. The astronauts took many photographs of the Earth as it passed by below them. Walker saluted the ground control teams at the Guam and Santiago, Chile, tracking stations, scheduled for closure at the end of STS-30. The deployment of the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System made many ground stations obsolete.

To begin their third day in space, Mission Control awaked the astronauts with fight songs from their alma maters. The rousing music prompted Walker to say, “Good morning, Houston! Thanks for the great music!” After giving Mission Control a video tour of Atlantis’ cabin, Thagard and Lee began a test to see if the LES helmet with a Helmet Retention Assembly can serve to prebreathe pure oxygen prior to a spacewalk. With no spacewalk planned for STS-30, their test simply intended to prove the concept. After Thagard and Lee began to breathe pure oxygen, the crew lowered the cabin pressure from the nominal 14.7 pounds per square inch (psi) to 10.2 psi to assist in the prevention of decompression sickness, also known as the bends. After completing the one-hour test, Thagard and Lee removed their helmets.

Mary L. Cleave videotapes the progress of an experiment in the Fluids Experiment Apparatus Norman E. Thagard, left, and Mark C. Lee during the helmet retention assembly prebreathe test Inflight photograph of the STS-30 crew
Left: Mary L. Cleave videotapes the progress of an experiment in the Fluids Experiment Apparatus. Middle: Norman E. Thagard, left, and Mark C. Lee during the helmet retention assembly prebreathe test. Right: Inflight photograph of the STS-30 crew.

Mission Control began the astronaut’s fourth day in space, their last full day in orbit, with the theme music from the movie “Rocky.” The day’s first major event involved a 15-minute news conference with United Press International reporters Rob Navias and Bill Harwood. In preparation for the entry and landing the following day, the astronauts tested the vehicle’s Auxiliary Power Units, aerodynamic surfaces, and reaction control system thrusters. They then repressurized the cabin back to 14.7 psi. Suddenly, one of the spacecraft’s General Purpose Computers (GPC-4) went offline, failing to synchronize with the other GPCs. While not an immediate impact to their work, Mission Control was concerned about its function during the critical entry and landing the next day, and they ordered the crew to replace the faulty unit, never before done in space. The astronauts successfully completed the four-hour task and had the replacement GPC up and running, but the time spent on the computer replacement caused the cancellation of the final FEA sample run. The crew stayed up an extra hour to complete all their stowage tasks before retiring for their final night’s sleep in space.

Mission Control began the astronaut’s fourth day in space, their last full day in orbit, with the theme music from the movie “Rocky.” The day’s first major event involved a 15-minute news conference with United Press International reporters Rob Navias and Bill Harwood. In preparation for the entry and landing the following day, the astronauts tested the vehicle’s Auxiliary Power Units, aerodynamic surfaces, and reaction control system thrusters. They then repressurized the cabin back to 14.7 psi. Suddenly, one of the spacecraft’s General Purpose Computers (GPC-4) went offline, failing to synchronize with the other GPCs. While not an immediate impact to their work, Mission Control was concerned about its function during the critical entry and landing the next day, and they ordered the crew to replace the faulty unit, never before done in space. The astronauts successfully completed the four-hour task and had the replacement GPC up and running, but the time spent on the computer replacement caused the cancellation of the final FEA sample run. The crew stayed up an extra hour to complete all their stowage tasks before retiring for their final night’s sleep in space. Atlantis touches down The STS-30 astronauts exit Atlantis
Left: Its landing gear lowered, Atlantis approaches the runway at Edwards Air Force Base in California. Middle: Atlantis touches down. Right: The STS-30 astronauts exit Atlantis.

On May 8, the astronauts awakened for their final day in space. The wake-up call from Mission Control consisted of a barking dog followed by The Beatles song “A Hard Day’s Night.” Capcom Kenneth D. Cameron greeted them with, “Good morning! It’s time to come home.” In preparation for reentry, the astronauts donned their orange LESs and closed the payload bay doors. Walker and Grabe oriented Atlantis into the deorbit attitude, with the OMS engines facing in the direction of travel. Over the Indian Ocean, they fired the two engines for 2 minutes 48 seconds to bring the spacecraft out of orbit. They reoriented the orbiter to fly with its heat shield exposed to the direction of flight as it encountered Earth’s atmosphere at 419,000 feet. The buildup of ionized gases caused by the heat of reentry prevented communications for about 15 minutes but provided the astronauts a great light show. Variable winds at Edwards Air Force Base in California complicated the decision on which runway to land on to complete a planned crosswind test. Mission Control decided to wait until 20 minutes before touchdown to make the final determination. With Atlantis out of the blackout, Mission Control directed the crew to land on concrete runway 22 with acceptable crosswinds for the test. After completing the 200-degree Heading Alignment Circle turn, Walker aligned Atlantis with the runway, and Grabe lowered the landing gear. Atlantis touched down and rolled to a stop, ending a 4-day 56-minute flight, having completed 65 orbits of the Earth.

Three impact craters in Venus’ Lavinia Planitia Volcano Sapas Mons Maat Mons, second highest peak on Venus
A sample of Magellan radar images of Venus. Left: Three impact craters in Venus’ Lavinia Planitia. Middle: Volcano Sapas Mons. Right: Maat Mons, second highest peak on Venus.

After deployment from the space shuttle, Magellan began its interplanetary journey. Midcourse corrections on May 21, 1989, March 13, 1990, and July 25, 1990, refined the trajectory as Magellan completed its 15-month journey to Venus on Aug. 10, 1990, entering an elliptical near-polar orbit around the planet. Recovering from two early communications glitches, Magellan began returning high-quality radar images of the cloud-shrouded planet on Sept. 15. The spacecraft completed its primary 243-day (the time it took Venus to complete one rotation) mission on May 15, 1991, imaging 83.7 percent of the planet’s surface at a resolution of between 100 and 250 meters, surpassing the original mission goals. It completed five more 243-day cycles, ending on Oct. 13, 1994, finishing with a coverage of 98 percent of the planet. In the summer of 1993, controllers commanded Magellan to skim through Venus’ upper atmosphere and use aerobraking to circularize its orbit to allow detailed mapping of the planet’s gravity field. To gather more aerodynamic data, controllers commanded Magellan to plunge into the Venusian atmosphere on Oct. 13, 1994, and it burned up on entry, having completed one of the most successful interplanetary missions during 15,000 orbits of Venus. The spacecraft returned more data than all of NASA’s previous planetary missions combined.

A topographic map of Venus based on Magellan radar data
A topographic map of Venus based on Magellan radar data. Image credit: courtesy United States Geologic Service.

Radar data from Magellan allowed cartographers to create the first, and so far, the most detailed, global map of Venus. The images revealed a surface dominated by volcanic features with few impact craters, implying a geologically young surface, less than 800 million years old. Although Venus has a dense atmosphere, Magellan found little evidence of wind erosion, and the total absence of water makes erosion a very slow process on the planet.

Enjoy the crew narrated video of the STS-30 mission.

Read Cleave’s recollections of the STS-30 mission in her oral history with the JSC History Office.

Powered by WPeMatico

Get The Details…
Kelli Mars