![\"NGC](\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/smbhs-labeled.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>Most smaller galaxies may not have supermassive black holes in their centers, according to a recent \u00a0study using NASA\u2019s Chandra X-ray Observatory. This contrasts with the common idea that nearly every galaxy has one of these giant black holes within their cores, as NASA leads the world in exploring how our universe works.<\/p>\n
A team of astronomers used data from over 1,600 galaxies collected in more than two decades of the Chandra mission. The researchers looked at galaxies ranging in heft from over ten times the mass of the Milky Way down to dwarf galaxies, which have stellar masses less than a few percent of that of our home galaxy. A paper describing these results has been published in The Astrophysical Journal and is available here https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2510.05252<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n The team has reported that only about 30% of dwarf galaxies likely contain supermassive black holes.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s important to get an accurate black hole head count in these smaller galaxies,\u201d said Fan Zou of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, who led the study. \u201cIt\u2019s more than just bookkeeping. Our study gives clues about how supermassive black holes are born. It also provides crucial hints about how often black hole signatures in dwarf galaxies can be found with new or future telescopes.\u201d<\/p>\n As material falls onto black holes, it is heated by friction and produces X-rays. Many of the massive galaxies in the study contain bright X-ray sources in their centers, a clear signature of supermassive black holes in their centers. The team concluded that more than 90% of massive galaxies \u2013 including those with the mass of the Milky Way \u2013 contain supermassive black holes.<\/p>\n However, smaller galaxies in the study usually did not have these unambiguous black hole signals. Galaxies with masses less than three billion Suns \u2013 about the mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud, a close neighbor to the Milky Way \u2013 usually do not contain bright X-ray sources in their centers.<\/p>\n The researchers considered two possible explanations for this lack of X-ray sources. The first is that the fraction of galaxies containing massive black holes is much lower for these less massive galaxies. The second is the amount of X-rays produced by matter falling onto these black holes is so faint that Chandra cannot detect it.<\/p>\n \u201cWe think, based on our analysis of the Chandra data, that there really are fewer black holes in these smaller galaxies than in their larger counterparts,\u201d said Elena Gallo, a co-author also from the University of Michigan.<\/p>\n To reach their conclusion, Zou and his colleagues considered both possibilities for the lack of X-ray sources in small galaxies in their large Chandra sample. The amount of gas falling onto a black hole determines how bright or faint they are in X-rays. Because smaller black holes are expected to pull in less gas than larger black holes, they should be fainter in X-rays and often not detectable. The researchers confirmed this expectation.\u00a0<\/p>\n However, they found that an additional deficit of X-ray sources is seen in less massive galaxies beyond the expected decline from decreases in the amount of gas falling inwards. This additional deficit can be accounted for if many of the low-mass galaxies simply don\u2019t have any black holes at their centers. The team\u2019s conclusion was that the drop in X-ray detections in lower mass galaxies reflects a true decrease in the number of black holes located in these galaxies.<\/p>\n This result could have important implications for understanding how supermassive black holes form. There are two main ideas: In the first, a giant gas cloud directly collapses into a black hole, which contains thousands of times the Sun\u2019s mass from the start. The other idea is that supermassive black holes instead come from much smaller black holes, created when massive stars collapse.<\/p>\n \u201cThe formation of big black holes is expected to be rarer, in the sense that it occurs preferentially in the most massive galaxies being formed, so that would explain why we don\u2019t find black holes in all the smaller galaxies,\u201d said co-author Anil Seth of the University of Utah.<\/p>\n This study supports the theory where giant black holes are born already weighing several thousand times the Sun\u2019s mass. If the other idea were true, the researchers said they would have expected smaller galaxies to likely have the same fraction of black holes as larger ones.<\/p>\n This result also could have important implications for the rates of black hole mergers from the collisions of dwarf galaxies. A much lower number of black holes would result in fewer sources of gravitational waves to be detected in the future by the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. The number of black holes tearing stars apart in dwarf galaxies will also be smaller.<\/p>\n NASA\u2019s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, manages the Chandra program. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory\u2019s Chandra X-ray Center controls science operations from Cambridge, Massachusetts, and flight operations from Burlington, Massachusetts.<\/p>\n To learn more about Chandra, visit:<\/p>\n https:\/\/science.nasa.gov\/chandra<\/a><\/p>\n Learn more about the Chandra X-ray Observatory and its mission here:<\/p>\n https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/chandra<\/a><\/p>\n https:\/\/chandra.si.edu<\/a><\/p>\n Megan Watzke Corinne Beckinger
Read more from NASA\u2019s Chandra X-ray Observatory<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\nNews Media Contact<\/h2>\n
<\/strong>Chandra X-ray Center
Cambridge, Mass.
617-496-7998
mwatzke@cfa.harvard.edu<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/strong>Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama
256-544-0034
corinne.m.beckinger@nasa.gov<\/a><\/p>\nShare<\/h2>\n<\/p><\/div>\n