4 min read<\/p>\n
Preparations for Next Moonwalk Simulations Underway (and Underwater)<\/h1>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"Two](\"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/AFRC2016-0195-196\/AFRC2016-0195-196~large.jpg?w=1920&h=1280&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint\")
<\/a><\/figure>\nNASA pilot Nils Larson, and flight test engineer and pilot Wayne Ringelberg, head for a mission debrief after flying a NASA F\/A-18 at Mach 1.38 to create sonic booms as part of the Sonic Booms in Atmospheric Turbulence flight series at NASA\u2019s Armstrong Flight Research Center in California, to study sonic boom signatures with and without the element of atmospheric turbulence.<\/div>\nNASA\/Lauren Hughes<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nNASA research pilots are experts on how to achieve the right flight-test conditions for experiments and the tools needed for successful missions. It is that expertise that enables pilots to help researchers learn how an aircraft can fly their technology innovations and save time and money, while increasing the innovation\u2019s readiness for use.<\/p>\n
NASA pilots detailed how they help researchers find the right fit for experiments that might not advance without proving that they work in flight as they do in modeling, simulation, and ground tests at the Ideas to Flight Workshop on Sept. 18 at NASA\u2019s Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California. \u201cStart the conversation early and make sure you have the right people in the conversation,\u201d said Tim Krall, a NASA Armstrong flight operations engineer. \u201cWhat we are doing better is making sure pilots are included earlier in a flight project to capitalize on their experience and knowledge.\u201d<\/p>\n
Flight research is often used to prove or refine computer models, try out new systems, or increase a technology\u2019s readiness. Sometimes, pilots guide a research project involving experimental aircraft. For example, pilots play a pivotal role on the X-59 aircraft<\/a>, which will fly faster than the speed of sound while generating a quiet thump, rather than a loud boom. In the future, NASA\u2019s pilots with fly the X-59 over select U.S. communities to gather data about how people on the ground perceive sonic thumps. NASA will provide this information to regulators to potentially change regulations that currently prohibit commercial supersonic flight over land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"Three](\"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/AFRC2024-0144-145\/AFRC2024-0144-145~large.jpg?w=1920&h=1281&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint\")
<\/a><\/figure>\nMark Russell, center, a research pilot at NASA\u2019s Glenn Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, explains the differences in flight environments at different NASA centers. Jim Less, a NASA pilot at NASA\u2019s Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California, left, Russell, and Nils Larson, NASA Armstrong chief X-59 aircraft pilot and senior advisor on flight research, provided perspective on flight research at the Ideas to Flight Workshop on Sept. 18 at NASA Armstrong.<\/div>\nNASA\/Genaro Vavuris<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\u201cWe have been involved with X-59 aircraft requirements and design process from before it was an X-plane,\u201d said Nils Larson, NASA chief X-59 aircraft pilot and senior advisor on flight research. \u201cI was part of pre-formulation and formulation teams. I was also on the research studies and brought in NASA pilot Jim Less in for a second opinion. Because we had flown missions in the F-15 and F-18, we knew the kinds of systems, like autopilots, that we need to get the repeatability and accuracy for the data.\u201d<\/p>\n
NASA pilots\u2019 experience can provide guidance to enable a wide range of flight experiments. A lot of times researchers have an idea of how to get the required flight data, but sometimes, Larson explains, while there are limits to what an aircraft can do \u2013 like flying the DC-8 upside down, there are maneuvers that given the right mitigations, training, and approval could simulate those conditions.<\/p>\n
Less says he\u2019s developed an approach to help focus researchers: \u201cWhat do you guys really need? A lot of what we do is mundane, but anytime you go out and fly, there is some risk. We don\u2019t want to take a risk if we are going after data that nobody needs, or it is not going to serve a purpose, or the quality won\u2019t work.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/figure>NASA research pilots are experts on how to achieve the right flight-test conditions for experiments and the tools needed for successful missions. It is that expertise that enables pilots to help researchers learn how an aircraft can fly their technology innovations and save time and money, while increasing the innovation\u2019s readiness for use.<\/p>\n
NASA pilots detailed how they help researchers find the right fit for experiments that might not advance without proving that they work in flight as they do in modeling, simulation, and ground tests at the Ideas to Flight Workshop on Sept. 18 at NASA\u2019s Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California. \u201cStart the conversation early and make sure you have the right people in the conversation,\u201d said Tim Krall, a NASA Armstrong flight operations engineer. \u201cWhat we are doing better is making sure pilots are included earlier in a flight project to capitalize on their experience and knowledge.\u201d<\/p>\n
Flight research is often used to prove or refine computer models, try out new systems, or increase a technology\u2019s readiness. Sometimes, pilots guide a research project involving experimental aircraft. For example, pilots play a pivotal role on the X-59 aircraft<\/a>, which will fly faster than the speed of sound while generating a quiet thump, rather than a loud boom. In the future, NASA\u2019s pilots with fly the X-59 over select U.S. communities to gather data about how people on the ground perceive sonic thumps. NASA will provide this information to regulators to potentially change regulations that currently prohibit commercial supersonic flight over land.<\/p>\n \u201cWe have been involved with X-59 aircraft requirements and design process from before it was an X-plane,\u201d said Nils Larson, NASA chief X-59 aircraft pilot and senior advisor on flight research. \u201cI was part of pre-formulation and formulation teams. I was also on the research studies and brought in NASA pilot Jim Less in for a second opinion. Because we had flown missions in the F-15 and F-18, we knew the kinds of systems, like autopilots, that we need to get the repeatability and accuracy for the data.\u201d<\/p>\n NASA pilots\u2019 experience can provide guidance to enable a wide range of flight experiments. A lot of times researchers have an idea of how to get the required flight data, but sometimes, Larson explains, while there are limits to what an aircraft can do \u2013 like flying the DC-8 upside down, there are maneuvers that given the right mitigations, training, and approval could simulate those conditions.<\/p>\n Less says he\u2019s developed an approach to help focus researchers: \u201cWhat do you guys really need? A lot of what we do is mundane, but anytime you go out and fly, there is some risk. We don\u2019t want to take a risk if we are going after data that nobody needs, or it is not going to serve a purpose, or the quality won\u2019t work.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/a><\/figure>